When speaking to clients it becomes clear that the same questions about the framework keep arising time and again. Although these tend to evolve over time, I’ve taken the five most common queries I’m currently asked, and turned them into a series of weekly blog posts in the hope that they will answer at least some of the questions that people may have about this strategy delivery framework.
Week 1 - OKR vs SMART Goals
OKR (Objectives and Key Results) and SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) goals are both frameworks designed to improve goal setting and strategic achievement in organisations. While they share common ground in providing structure and clarity, their approaches, purposes, and implementation differ significantly. Understanding these similarities and differences can help organisations choose the right framework for their needs.
Similarities:
Clarity and Focus:
Both OKR and SMART goals aim to bring clarity to an organisation's goals, ensuring everyone understands what needs to be achieved and the criteria for success.
Measurability:
They emphasize measurable outcomes. In OKRs, key results are quantifiable, while in SMART goals, the 'Measurable' component is explicitly defined.
Accountability:
Both frameworks promote accountability by assigning specific goals and tracking progress. This helps in monitoring performance and identifying areas needing improvement.
Alignment:
Both methodologies aim to align team goals with the broader objectives of the organisation, ensuring that every effort contributes to the overall mission and vision.
Review and Feedback:
Regular review and feedback cycles are integral to both frameworks. OKRs typically have quarterly or trimesterly reviews, while SMART goals can have varied review timelines depending on the specific timeframe set.
Differences:
Structure and Components:
OKR:
Objectives: These are high-level, qualitative goals that define what you want to achieve. They are ambitious and inspirational.
Key Results: These are specific, quantifiable outcomes that measure the achievement of the objective. Multiple key results support each objective.
SMART:
Goals are framed to be Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. Each goal must explicitly meet all five criteria to be effective.
Purpose and Approach:
OKR:
Encourages ambitious, sometimes even aspirational goals, designed to push the organisation beyond its comfort zone. They are not always 100% achievable; success is often considered if 70-80% of key results are met.
OKRs promote continuous improvement and innovation, encouraging teams to set stretch goals.
SMART:
Focuses on setting realistic and attainable goals. Each goal should be feasible and within reach to ensure that individuals and teams can achieve them.
SMART goals are practical and ensure that every goal is specific and time-bound, making it easier to track and manage.
Frequency and Flexibility:
OKR:
OKRs bake in the importance of agility, and as such are typically set quarterly at team level, allowing organisations to adapt and pivot based on progress and changes in the environment.
This framework is more dynamic, allowing for frequent adjustments and realignment.
SMART:
SMART goals can be set for any timeframe (short-term or long-term) and are usually more static once set. They provide a stable target without frequent changes.
Focus on Individual vs. organisational goals:
OKR:
OKRs often focus on the organisation’s strategic objectives and cascade down to business unit or team levels. This ensures alignment with the company's broader vision and strategy.
SMART:
SMART goals can be used at any level but are often applied to individual or team tasks, ensuring specific, actionable steps towards broader objectives.
Cultural Impact:
OKR:
Promotes a culture of transparency and cross functional working, as OKRs are often shared across the organisation. This visibility fosters collaboration and collective responsibility.
SMART:
May not require the same level of transparency and can be used more flexibly within different parts of the organisation without needing to be universally shared.
Conclusion:
While both OKR and SMART goals aim to enhance goal setting and achievement, their differences lie in their approach, structure, and purpose. OKRs are better suited for organisations seeking to drive ambitious, strategic initiatives and those looking to foster a culture of innovation and agility. In contrast, SMART goals are ideal for setting clear, attainable, and specific goals within more traditionally structured organisations, ensuring practical and focused outcomes. Organisations can choose either, or blend elements of both to suit their strategic needs and operational context.
Stay tuned for next week's article - Why Adopt The OKR Framework At All?
Comments